blackprof.com home Spencer Overton Shavar Jeffries Adrien Wing Paul Butler Sherrilyn Ifill Christopher Bracey Terry Smith Emma Coleman Jordan Marc Hill Jody Armour Angela Onwuachi-Willig

About

If you have suggestions or questions about this blog, please contact or .

Books By Contributors

Kim McLarin's Book

Sherrilyn Ifill's Book

Spencer Overton's book Stealing Democracy now available!

Melissa Harris-Lacewell's book Barbershops, Bibles, and BET: Everyday Talk and Black Political Thought.

Rachel Godsil's book Awakening From The Dream

« Are Charter Schools Really Any Better Than Public Schools? | Main | Obama takes HIV/AIDS test in Kenya. And you? »

Survivor Getting Racial

survivor.jpg

On September 14, CBS will unveil the thirteenth season of the popular reality show “Survivor.” Like its predecessors, the upcoming season will send 20 people to a tropical island, divide the teams into four “tribes,” and have them compete against each other until one person is left standing. In addition to intensifying the colonial gaze through its reductive and exoticized representations of the “other,” the show has added yet another problematic twist: this year’s tribes will be divided by race. While the producers are labeling the show as a “social experiment, ” many critics are already dismissing it as a racist publicity stunt.

To be certain, the producers of the show are motivated by the high ratings that accompany such a sensational premise. Given the enormous hype and early high ratings for FX’s race-centered Black/White, it was merely a matter of time before another network followed suit. Initially, Donald Trump was planning to do a race-themed season of The Apprentice but opted out at the last minute. This was a wise business move, as the backlash from an offensive moment or two could permanently derail the series. Such a moment would have inevitable given Trump’s rough demeanor, disrespectful treatment of Omorosa, and public diss to Randal Pinkett.  Unfortunately, the folks at CBS don't share Trumps keen understanding of his own limitations.

Many critics have blasted the show for promoting racism through its racially segregated teams. Such a belief is undergirded by a wrongheaded liberal approach to race that eschews any recognition of racial difference. While I don’t believe that dividing teams by race is fundamentally racist, the claim that this show is an “experiment” that can tell us anything meaningful about race is spurious. Like FX’s Black/White, Survivor places relatively privileged people (check the list of participants) in contrived circumstances that don’t approximate the conditions of American social life.

Although White privilege, anti-Black racism, and systemic inequality certainly seep through the porous cultural walls of reality television, they are obscured by the heavily orchestrated interactions and identity performances that the reality television genre demands. Unfortunately, many Americans lack the theoretical tools and political will to understand how just how inaccurate and mendacious the show’s “findings” are. Just like in Black/White, when everyday people buttressed claims that racism didn’t exist by pointing out that Bruno (the White guy turned Black) didn’t get ignored in the shoe store, the new Survivor runs the risk of misstating the truth by overstating its “realness.”

If the folks at CBS want to use Survivor to talk about race, they should figure out how Black people manage to survive with inadequate health care, diminishing job opportunities, poor schools, and institutionalized racism.

But that, of course, would be too real for them.

TrackBack

TrackBack URL for this entry:
http://www.blackprof.com/mt/mt-tb.cgi/556

Listed below are links to weblogs that reference Survivor Getting Racial:

» credit fixing rating from credit fixing rating
[Read More]

» Mens Shoe Stores from Mens Shoe Stores
Shoe Stores Shoe Stores Payless ShoeSource Department Stores. Height Increasing S [Read More]

Comments

The problem with Survivor being divided by race is that nothing inherent in what the contestants do would be of any value to making any opinions about race. Casting will be the dealbreaker, not performance.

Trump's decision notwithstanding, his show would have actually been a better test --all things being equal on each side.

Great thoughts...I added a brief section of your post to my most recent blog post on the topic.

--RC of strangeculture.blogspot.com

Since all contestants are screened (selected) the winning team/person could be selected in (or out). This, of course, is the case anyway. The object of the show is not to have a real competition, it is to get and retain viewers.

How different is this from seperating the teams according to sex? I think this could be an interesting experiment to watch. It may open the eyes of many who carry the beleif that minororites that do well on reality shows only do so on the backs their fellow white players. Then again, minority watching may watch and find differences that hinder their own advancement. Thanks for letting me know about this new twist of the game. I will be watching this season.

How different is this from seperating the teams according to sex? I think this could be an interesting experiment to watch. It may open the eyes of many who carry the beleif that minororites who do well on reality shows only do so on the backs their fellow white players. Then again, minorities watching may watch and find differences that hinder their own advancement.

Thanks for letting me know about this new twist of the game. I will be watching this season.

Dr. Hill,

I saw you on CNN last night talking about the Survivor show. Great job! Too bad the woman from "Real World" cut you off.

This lame attempt at programming is a take off form the Mel Brooks Movie "The Producers" where the main characters deliberately tried to produce the most offensive show possible (Springtime for Hitler) to get out of a contract. Unfortunately, their show was a hit. Here, we have a reality show with falling ratings and this is their attempt to get back in the game by coming up with the most offensive concept in television. It may work, but not with me. I will not support segregation. To call this a social experiment and to attempt diversity by segregation is an insult to my intelligence. Whoever came up with this not so original idea should be fired.

CMoney I certainly understand your point of view.Having only watched a few of the "reality" genre TV shows, it became obvious to me that minority participants(particularly males) are at a disadvantage when it is the group that "votes" to expel one of their own.
Big Brother,Survivor and others of this ilk, demonstrate the methods used to justify discrimination practiced by a majority to eliminate any minority obstacle to their perception of the appropriate outcome.
Shows such as the Amazing Race where contestants control their own destinies by performance alone, seem to provide a much more level playing field for the minority participant. Perhaps that is why more minorities have been successful over fewer seasons.

Has anyone heard about an organized protest against this plan? If so, please post it.

Has anyone heard about an organized protest against this plan? If so, please post.

I've gone to cbs.com and sent an e-mail in their feedback section. Who knows how effective that is, but I'm sure somebody is taking notes.

Reality TV has long been the lowest form of "entertainment" available outside of a cat house. The entire idea is to mock, deride and have viewers see themselves as morally superior to the contestants.

It's like the old public executions dressed up slightly. No surprise that they would dip to this level of disgusting race baiting. I think if anything blacks or other minorities "performing poorly" in these shows would look good... they do not fit in well with the scum that populate such shows.

"But that, of course, would be too real for them."

Aye, there's the rub Prof Hill.

If we're looking to reality TV for lessons in reality then we are doing ourselves a profound disservice.

This is a entertainment! And, with all the attention being paid to this gimmick, it will do exactly what CBS intended it to do: entertain people and make lots of money.

Instead of blaming CBS, why not question the blacks who've agreed to be used in this way.

Indeed, don't you think we'd be better served if we were screaming racism because there were probably few, if any, blacks involved in the decision-making process that led to this survival of the races stunt?

(Incidentally, is there any more embarrassing portrayal of black people on TV than Leo Terrel playing himself?)

I noticed they didn't include Middle Eastern, East Indian or Aboriginal people. Does the show not know that there is more than 4 races or do they try to ignore that?

I don't know the backgrounds of the participants.

If they matched street smart black people to spoiled, white suburbanites and bookish Asians? Totally unfair.

I demand a Special Forces white guy for affirmative action compensation for the inferior survivability of the whites and Asians.

Lethe,

What's wrong with a cat house? I take exception to your denigration of cats.

:-)

Wendy,

Race is really nothing but a social construct. Your looks simply reflect a certain gene pool within humanity. There are white/caucasian Asians, Black but non-African Asians, Mongol and Malay Asians, etc. Africa and African blood lines have Black African, Indo-European, Malasian bloodlines. Latino or Hispanic if Mexican is largely Native American with European blood and perhaps some African, but Latino identity varies significantly from country to country. My point is that race as we use it is dead wrong. We construct barriers between people that fly in the face of science and our genetic history. Check out the human genome project. I would like to see us learn more about what we have in common as human rather than socialized stereotypes that may not even reflect the so-called racial group. What makes these persons representative of anything other than themselves? Come on CBS!!!!!!!!!!!!!

Ricardo's remarks are human genomically correct.

I agree with Ricardo that there is no such thing as race, but that it is a social construct. As a Black "Latina" I do not believe in the Hispanic/Latino race at all. It's non-extent as far as I'm concerned. And I see that the show is playing up steretypical representations of race. And as far as Latinos being predominately White and Indian, I'm not so sure that's true. According to the World Bank Whites make up the majority of the 540 million people in Latin America. And African Descendants (incorrectly used) make up 1/3 of Latin America, while Indians make up only 30 million. Of course, this leaves no room for mixed people. I don't know whether any of this is true, because race in Latin America is base on perception, among other things. Although, African descendants in my opinion make up more than a third of Latin America. People who are physically Black make a 1/3 of the population.

I cannot believe this was allowed to go on T.V. First of all, you know they will pick sterotypes of different ethic groups. This will only feed racial sterotypes ignorant people have of others. I recently found the group photo and noticed that all the asians and whites picked for the season are fit. While several of the Latinos and Blacks are not. Since many of the challenges in the show are physical. One can only guess who'll lose first. I firmly believe that everyone should boycott the show and its sponsors. The show may still go on for the season but the sponsors can and will pull out.

(ywqdz)
Try Look here!!! it's great
http://fitness_61463sf7.kuchasaitov.info >fitness
[url=http://fitness_61463sf7.kuchasaitov.info]fitness[/url]
http://fitness_equipment_61463sf7.kuchasaitov.info >fitness equipment
[url=http://fitness_equipment_61463sf7.kuchasaitov.info]fitness equipment[/url]
http://24_hour_fitness_61463sf7.kuchasaitov.info >24 hour fitness
[url=http://24_hour_fitness_61463sf7.kuchasaitov.info]24 hour fitness[/url]

it's really helped me
let's enjoy the life
(dtnlt)

Thanks for signing in, . Now you can comment. (sign out)

(If you haven't left a comment here before, you may need to be approved by the site owner before your comment will appear. Until then, it won't appear on the entry. Thanks for waiting.)


Remember me?


Subscribe

Get blackprof at email address:

Advice

Click here to Ask Mom a question!

Ask Mom: The advice column for law professors.

Click here to learn more.

Subscribe to this blog's feed: Atom | RSS 2.0
[What is this?]
Powered by
Movable Type 3.2