Survivor: Cook Island Thread ā Thoughts on the Premiere Episode?
I wanted to provide some immediate space for folks to voice any thoughts, comments, and ideas concerning the first episode of Survivor: Cook Island, which aired Thursday night at 8:00 EST. I suspect that others contributors will likely want to write their own posts on the matter in the coming days. In the meantime, I invite you offer your preliminary reactions in this thread.
First, a quick recap:
As most of you are aware, contestants on this season’s Survivor are grouped into tribes based upon ethnicity – African American, Asian American, Latino, and “Caucasian.”
The first challenge was puzzle-based – each tribe had to assemble a boat, paddle out into the sea to a buoy to light a torch, paddle back, assemble a compass puzzle, use pieces from the boat to create a ladder, place the assembled compass puzzle into position on a wall/tower structure, climb the tower structure, and light the torch at the top of the tower.
The first three teams won immunity. The last team went to “tribal council” during which one of their members was voted off.
The Asians came in first, the Latinos came in second, the “Caucasians” came in third, and the African Americans came in last. And last by a significant margin, I might add.
Where is Claude Steele (Mr. Stereotype Threat) when you need him?
The African American team was made up of two men and three women. Initially, the two lighter-skinned women bonded, and appeared to exclude the darker skinned woman. The two men likewise bonded, and excluded all the women.
After the tribe lost the challenge, the three women came together, despite efforts by the two men to bring the dark-skinned woman on to their side.
At tribal council, it was three votes to two – and the biggest, darkest male (who, by the way, had attempted to assume a leadership role in the tribe), was the first person to leave the show.
Now, some initial thoughts:
As an initial matter, the producers trafficked heavily in stereotypes – at least to my eyes. The communal and cooperative Latinos. The Asian refugee with mysterious healing powers. The lazy African American male. The chivalrous white male. I wasn’t shocked by what I saw – more disappointed at the missed opportunity to explore racial and ethnic difference in a new and interesting way.
Second, I wanted very badly to know how the African American team felt losing the first challenge. Did the team view this as a confirmation of some stereotype? Some of the tribe members had spoken of representing “the race” or “the community.” How did they feel they represented?
Third, I wanted to hear more from the other tribes about what their first “victory” (ie. not coming dead last in the first challenge) meant to them, and what they thought of the fact that the African Americans came in last.
Fourth, I was somewhat taken aback when I heard the African American tribe members speak in terms of representing the race. I honestly didn’t feel that I was represented. And I can imagine a number of other folks (southerners, baby boomers, etc.) feeling the same way.
Finally, I think that one of the most interesting storylines will be the relationships on the Asian American team – specifically between the refugee and his teammates. There is a tremendous cultural gulf there, and I’m anxious to see if it gets explored more deeply in subsequent episodes.
Anyway, these are just a few of my preliminary thoughts. What were yours?











Comments
i found the whole premise disturbing. what does it prove if the black or caucasians tribes win in the artificial scenarios presented by this "reality" show? nothing.
likewise, what is revealed if the opposite results hold?
nothing.
yet many people will apply the results to reinforce many stereotypes that they already hold. i am not against politically incorrect queries or artistic endeavors so long as they are intellectually honest. clearly, the latest survivor is all shock value, providing no redeeming social or intellectual value to justify these racial contests. in the end, it can only cause dissension.
Posted by: the watcher | September 14, 2006 11:03 PM
I agree with "the watcher." The premise is a bit disturbing, and there's a less than subtle implication that each team's results should be generalized to the rest of "the race." Thus, every team has the "lose, and you'll confirm or racial stereotypes." It seems unfair, especially for a relatively randomly selected group.
On the other hand, to play devil's advocate, this may reflect reality more than many of us care to admit. Jesse Owens had to compete against stereotypes in the Olympics. Black quarterbacks in the NFL are often asked about stereotypes and are held up as test cases to confirm or disprove the validity of the notion that black people can't be effective quarterbacks in the NFL. Maybe this show will make more people aware that many minorities are asked to "represent their race" instead of being evaluated as individuals, and maybe more people will think about what sort of a burden that puts on people and whether it's fair.
That said, however, Survivor has never struck me as a show that makes people think--especially not the people who most need to do some thinking.
Posted by: TO | September 15, 2006 10:27 AM
I also found the premise a little disturbing. I thought about it for a long while and came to the conclusion that I was afraid that certain stereotypes may be reinforced by the groupings. I was shocked when Sekou actually took a nap in the middle of his tribe trying to build a fire (lazy black man stereotype). I must admit I also smiled to myself when the senior white male "stole" a chicken from the asian group (Oppressive colonialist white male sterotype). I'm sure this will stir a lot of crap up for me and those in the country who watch. I wonder what the native americans thought of that move. I also wondered why they weren't invited as a group. We've already seen a good number of white folk participate on this show.
Posted by: saint james (african american, black, american negroe | September 15, 2006 03:20 PM
Interesting how these white supremist tv producers can put on a show and get Black people arguing about its social impact. In case you haven't figured it out yet: it is just entertainment. How about some of you Black intellects getting together to create a tv show which can demonstrate Black people's determination to be self-sufficient and empowered.
Black schools and colleges to educate Black students, Black businesses supported by Black people, a Black political party addressing the needs and wants of Black people.
Or are you content to continue waiting for these white supremist to display you in the most negative ways possible and you arguing about it? white supremist rely on you reacting the way you do when you see something you find controversial. Let's show ourselves that we can be proactive and disciplined: a Black first agenda. (Black = all descendants of Black Africans)
Posted by: BigDogg | September 15, 2006 10:02 PM
Well just goes to show....Latinos can build rafts.. Asian are good at the puzzles. the whities did ok.. and the blacks can't solve puzzles or do well in the water.. Maybe next week's challenge will be easier!!!
Posted by: GWBush | September 16, 2006 09:26 PM
What team do George Allen's macacas get to be on?
There is forensic software available that can provide the mix of continental ancestry and eye color of a perp or an unidentifiable corpse. It has been instrumental in tracking down a serial killer. And it is rarely used.
Think about it: our society would prefer to allow the violent murders of more innocents rather than use a politically incorrect hint about the looks and ancestry of the killers.
BTW Allen's maccacas are, of course, predominantly caucasian. That would, no doubt, be disturbing news to George.
Best, Terry
Posted by: terry hallinan | September 16, 2006 09:41 PM
Bracey says, "Iām anxious to see if [cultural difference] gets explored more deeply in subsequent episodes." Um. Have you watched Survivor? It's a game show. Nothing much gets "explored deeply" ... except maybe petty annoyances. I mean, watching the fire burn down is "island TV" and bowel obstructions are major plot points.
A few seasons back the tribes were segregated by sex and there was much overconfidence on the part of the young males. The boy team ended up losing challenge after challenge because they couldn't work together. Does that say something about the sexes? Something, I suppose.
I get a kick out of Survivor. You can't predict who is going to get to the final circle. Last season pudgy black city girl Cirie (doing the ew-icky dance over the dustiness of leaves while setting up camp) ended up in the final few because she was smart about people (and got over her squeamishness over the environment) and because she wasn't the shrinking violet she seemed. If she'd had one more day to practice making fire I'd have bet on her winning the whole thing. Does that say something about race? Something, maybe, but what?
Posted by: GI | September 16, 2006 11:00 PM
Don't know. You haven't told us what her race is.
Presumably the "girl" is an African-American but that only describes her cultural affiliation. Skin color is indicative of ancestry but so are many other things.
Wouldn't it be nice if we could use the language of science rather than the language of prejudice with its tribal connotations?
The difference between what the DNA tells us and what bigots claim can be the difference between life and death in medicine and in other aspects of our culture.
Best, Terry
Posted by: terry hallinan | September 17, 2006 09:06 AM
I'm way late on this, but I made an interesting notation. They already put tribes together with men and women. I noticed that the two teams that came in last both had three women and two men, whereas the two teams that came in first had three men and two women. Further, the 'Asian' team that won had three athletic men and two athletic women, while the Latino team had that one big, really slow guy. And, no offense to the three black ladies, but none of them seemed that athletic at all (they refered to themselves as city girls I think), and the dude who was voted off who tried to make himself 'the leader' was as out of shape as that hefty latino guy. Those two are clearly the deadest weight, and I'd hazard a guess that that other guy is voted off ASAP by his team (they previewed the complaints about this guy already anyways).
Posted by: AC | September 18, 2006 12:31 AM
I have to agree with what many people have said on this post- Survivor is nothing more than a game show, therefore NOTHING can be learned from it.
Posted by: Anonymous | September 18, 2006 02:41 PM
Yes, it is true; survivor is just a game show. However, let's not be naive about this. In the perfect world that is what all viewers will think. In the real world people are sitting at home waiting for stereotypes to be fulfilled. They expect to see the black team struggle with tasks and everyday living. This will only reinforce how other races feel about blacks being inferior. Therefore, I think the black tribe should prove that we are a race to be reckoned with an prove to be the superior tribe on the island, not the weakest link.
Posted by: Chrissy | September 21, 2006 09:20 PM
"In the real world people are sitting at home waiting for stereotypes to be fulfilled. They expect to see the black team struggle with tasks and everyday living. This will only reinforce how other races feel about blacks being inferior. Therefore, I think the black tribe should prove that we are a race to be reckoned with an prove to be the superior tribe on the island, not the weakest link."
Yes Chrissy you're right about this. But tell what's the point of trying to educate ignorant people? Do you really believe that if the black tribe won that these people would think any differently of blacks?
Posted by: Debbie | September 23, 2006 12:04 PM
ionolsen19 Your home page its greatwww_4_2
www_4_3
www_4_4
www_4_5
www_4_6
www_4_7
www_4_8
www_4_9
www_4_10
www_4_11
Posted by: topicstarter | October 16, 2006 12:46 PM